Home Fact Checking & Sources Policy

Fact Checking & Sources Policy

Last Updated: August 13, 2026

At Perfect Lusa, we are committed to producing educational content based on credible, relevant, and reasonably verified information.

Our content may cover rapidly changing subjects such as technology, artificial intelligence, business, digital finance, software, digital marketing, science, education, and major global developments.

Because information can change quickly and different sources may report events from different perspectives, we use a structured approach to researching and verifying information before publication.

1. Our Fact Checking Commitment

We aim to ensure that factual information published by Perfect Lusa is:

  • Relevant
  • Accurate to the best of our knowledge
  • Supported by credible sources
  • Appropriately contextualized
  • Clearly distinguished from opinion or analysis
  • Updated when significant new information becomes available

We recognize that no fact checking process can eliminate every possible error.

2. Our Preferred Sources

Whenever reasonably available, we prioritize authoritative and primary sources.

These may include:

  • Government institutions
  • Regulatory authorities
  • Official company websites
  • Official announcements
  • Official documentation
  • Research institutions
  • Universities
  • Academic publications
  • Scientific journals
  • Public datasets
  • International organizations
  • Reputable news organizations

The appropriate source depends on the subject being researched.

3. News Organizations

For current events and developing stories, Perfect Lusa may consult reputable news organizations including:

  • BBC
  • Reuters
  • DW
  • Al Jazeera

These sources may provide important reporting, timelines, quotations, background information, and initial details about developing events.

However, their reporting is treated as research material and source information, not as content to be copied or mechanically rewritten.

4. Primary Sources First Where Possible

For important claims, we may attempt to locate the original or primary source.

For example, when discussing a technology company’s product announcement, we may check the company’s official announcement or documentation in addition to news coverage.

When discussing a government policy, we may consult the relevant government institution or official document.

When discussing research, we may consult the original research publication where reasonably available.

5. Cross Checking Information

Important information may be compared across multiple sources.

Cross checking can help identify:

  • Conflicting figures
  • Different dates
  • Incomplete reporting
  • Misinterpretations
  • Incorrect claims
  • Changes in developing stories
  • Missing context

The number of sources required may depend on the complexity and importance of the information.

6. Breaking News

Breaking news can change rapidly.

Early reports may contain incomplete or preliminary information.

When reporting or developing educational content from a developing event, we may:

  • Identify information as preliminary
  • Monitor subsequent updates
  • Compare multiple reports
  • Check official statements
  • Update published content when significant facts change

Readers should consider publication and update dates when reading time sensitive content.

7. Source Quality

Not all online sources have the same level of reliability.

When evaluating a source, we may consider:

  • Reputation
  • Expertise
  • Transparency
  • Originality of the information
  • Evidence provided
  • Publication date
  • Author or organization
  • Editorial standards
  • Whether the source has access to primary information

Anonymous posts, unverified social media claims, user generated content, and unknown websites may require additional verification before being treated as factual evidence.

8. Social Media Information

Social media may sometimes provide useful leads, statements, images, videos, or direct communications.

However, social media information may be:

  • Unverified
  • Edited
  • Misleading
  • Taken out of context
  • Old material presented as new
  • Incorrectly attributed

We therefore aim to verify important social media claims through reliable sources before presenting them as established facts.

9. Statistics and Numbers

When an article contains important statistics, figures, percentages, prices, rankings, market data, or other numerical information, we aim to verify the figures against a credible source.

Where appropriate, we may provide the source or explain the context surrounding the number.

Readers should remember that statistics can vary depending on:

  • Methodology
  • Time period
  • Geographic scope
  • Sample size
  • Definitions
  • Data collection methods

10. Dates and Timelines

Dates are particularly important when reporting technology launches, company announcements, policy changes, product releases, legal developments, or breaking events.

We aim to verify relevant dates using reliable sources.

If a date is uncertain or subject to change, we may communicate that uncertainty rather than present an unconfirmed date as definite.

11. Quotes and Statements

When quoting or reporting statements from individuals or organizations, we aim to preserve the meaning and context of the original statement.

We may use direct quotations only where appropriate and in accordance with applicable copyright and attribution requirements.

Where a statement is particularly important, we may consult the original interview, announcement, transcript, recording, or official publication where available.

12. Distinguishing Facts From Claims

We aim to distinguish between:

Confirmed information

Information supported by reliable evidence or authoritative sources.

Reported information

Information reported by credible third parties but not necessarily independently confirmed.

Claims

Statements made by an individual, company, organization, or other party that may require further verification.

Analysis

Interpretation based on available information.

Predictions

Possible future outcomes that are inherently uncertain.

This distinction helps readers understand the level of certainty associated with different statements.

13. Conflicting Sources

Sometimes reputable sources may provide different information.

When this occurs, we may:

  • Investigate the reason for the difference
  • Consult additional sources
  • Prioritize primary sources where available
  • Explain the disagreement
  • Attribute each position appropriately
  • Avoid presenting uncertain information as established fact

We may update an article when later evidence resolves a previously uncertain issue.

14. Source Attribution

When appropriate, Perfect Lusa may identify the source of important information.

Attribution may include:

  • Naming the source
  • Linking to the original source
  • Referencing an official document
  • Identifying the organization responsible for the information
  • Providing additional source context

Attribution helps readers conduct their own research and understand where information originated.

15. Original Educational Value

Perfect Lusa does not aim to simply reproduce news reports.

When a current event is used as the basis for an article, we aim to add educational value through:

  • Explanation
  • Context
  • Background
  • Practical examples
  • Technical information
  • Comparisons
  • Analysis
  • Lessons
  • Implications
  • Relevant resources

The purpose is to help readers understand a subject more deeply.

16. AI Assisted Research

AI assisted tools may be used to organize research, identify relevant concepts, structure information, or support parts of the editorial workflow.

However, AI generated information is not automatically treated as factual.

Important claims may be checked against reliable sources before publication.

For more information, please see our AI Usage & Content Policy.

17. Fact Checking After Publication

Fact checking does not necessarily end when an article is published.

We may continue monitoring important information, particularly for articles concerning:

  • Breaking news
  • Technology
  • Software
  • Artificial intelligence
  • Regulations
  • Business
  • Digital finance
  • Product launches
  • Security developments

When significant new information becomes available, an article may be updated.

18. Reader Reports

Readers can help improve the accuracy of Perfect Lusa by reporting potential errors.

If you believe an article contains incorrect information, please contact us and provide:

Article Title:
The title of the relevant article.

Article URL:
The direct link to the article.

Specific Statement:
The statement or information you believe is incorrect.

Reason:
Why you believe the information is incorrect.

Supporting Source:
A reliable source or evidence supporting your correction, where available.

We will review legitimate reports and make changes where appropriate.

19. Corrections

When a significant factual error is confirmed, we may correct the article.

Depending on the nature of the error, we may:

  • Correct the affected statement
  • Update the relevant section
  • Add clarification
  • Replace incorrect figures
  • Update the source
  • Add a correction note
  • Unpublish the affected content where necessary

For more information, please see our Corrections Policy.

20. Sponsored and Affiliate Content

Sponsored and affiliate relationships do not automatically determine the factual conclusions of our content.

Commercial content remains subject to applicable editorial and disclosure standards.

Where appropriate, commercial relationships will be clearly disclosed.

21. No Absolute Guarantee

Although we take reasonable steps to research and verify information, Perfect Lusa cannot guarantee that every piece of information will always remain completely accurate.

Information may change after publication.

Third party sources may also contain errors.

Readers should independently verify highly consequential information with relevant official or professional sources.

22. Our Standard

Our fact checking approach is based on five principles:

Source it.
Use credible evidence.

Check it.
Verify important claims.

Contextualize it.
Explain information rather than presenting isolated facts.

Distinguish it.
Separate facts, claims, analysis, and predictions.

Update it.
Correct or update information when necessary.

23. Related Policies

For more information about how Perfect Lusa creates and manages content, please review:

  • Editorial Policy
  • Corrections Policy
  • AI Usage & Content Policy
  • Advertising & Sponsored Content Policy
  • Affiliate Disclosure
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

24. Contact Us

If you have questions about our sources, fact checking process, or a specific factual claim published on Perfect Lusa, please contact us through our Contact Us page.

Perfect Lusa
Educational knowledge for the digital world.

Website: perfectlusa.pro

Last Updated: August 13, 2026